Claims & Public Adjusting: PI workflows next to property claims is a working standard, not a slogan. The goal is simple: pi workflows next to property claims should leave a trail any teammate can pick up without a hallway conversation.
Why this breaks in real teams
Some practices mix property and injury work. Keep types distinct but CRM-shared.
When it stays broken, people invent private workarounds: a spreadsheet, a group chat, a notebook in the truck. Those workarounds feel fast for one person and expensive for the company, because history never lands in one place.
The cost shows up later — missed follow-ups, duplicate customers, invoices that do not match the work, and new hires who cannot reconstruct what happened last week.
A clear standard for “done”
Safer multi-practice operations.
Write the standard in one sentence the whole team can repeat. If two people cannot agree whether an item is done without a meeting, the process is still vibes — not operations.
Good standards are observable: a dated next step on the record, a disposition on the call, a closed ticket with a note, a stage that maps to a real commitment from the customer.
How to run it day to day
Separate pipelines; shared contacts; clear role access.
- Start from the queue, not the inbox. Open the list that represents unfinished work in Claims & Public Adjusting. Sort by age or deadline first.
- Touch each item once with a decision. Close it, advance it, or assign it with a next step and a date. “I’ll remember” is not a decision.
- Write on the record while the context is fresh. Notes, files, outcomes, and ownership belong on the same object — not in a side thread that disappears.
- End with a short aging review. Anything older than your SLA either moves today or gets an explicit snooze reason on the record.
Field notes
Teach the motion with one real example from last week’s data, not a hypothetical. Walk the team through a single record: what should have been written, what was missing, and what the customer experienced because of it.
Do not mix statute clocks on one stage board.
What to refuse
Do not mix statute clocks on one stage board.
- A second copy of the customer in a personal tool “just for now.”
- Required fields nobody will fill — keep intake short; deepen later.
- Metrics that only exist in someone’s head or a private sheet.
- Access that is wider than the job requires, especially around money and deletes.
Who owns which part
- Leaders set the standard, the SLA, and which fields are required.
- Managers coach from the same queue the team works — not from private trackers.
- Doers create and update records as the work happens, not in a Friday dump.
- Viewers (finance partners, execs) read without mutating the operational trail.
If titles and access do not match, people either work around the system or step on each other. Align the job with the permission, then enforce the motion above.
How you know it is working
Safer multi-practice operations.
Check leading signals weekly: aging items, first-touch time, percent of completed work with a clean record trail, and how often people still open a shadow sheet. If the shadow sheet is gone and the queue still moves, the content of the process is real.